PDA

View Full Version : Mitchell report: Baseball slow to react to players' steroid use


Chief
12-13-2007, 04:02 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3153509

NEW YORK -- Roger Clemens turned out be Exhibit A in the long-awaited Mitchell report, an All-Star roster of players linked to steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs that put a question mark -- if not an asterisk -- next to some of baseball's biggest moments.

Barry Bonds, already under indictment on charges of lying to a federal grand jury about steroids, Miguel Tejada and Andy Pettitte also showed up Thursday in the game's most infamous lineup since the Black Sox scandal.

The report culminated a 20-month investigation by former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell, hired by commissioner Bud Selig to examine the steroids era.

"The illegal use of performance-enhancing substances poses a serious threat to the integrity of the game," the report said. "Widespread use by players of such substances unfairly disadvantages the honest athletes who refuse to use them and raises questions about the validity of baseball records."

Seven MVPs showed up and, in all, 80-some players were fingered, enough to put an All-Star at every position.

No one was hit harder than Clemens. The seven-time Cy Young Award winner was singled out in nearly nine pages, 82 references by name. Much of the information on Clemens came from Brian McNamee, the former New York Yankees strength and conditioning coach.

Through his attorney, Rusty Hardin, Clemens denied he used performance-enhancing drugs and expressed outrage that his name was included in the report.

"I have great respect for Senator Mitchell. I think an overall look at this problem in baseball was an excellent idea," Hardin said in a statement. "But I respectfully suggest it is very unfair to include Roger's name in this report. He is left with no meaningful way to combat what he strongly contends are totally false allegations. He has not been charged with anything, he will not be charged with anything and yet he is being tried in the court of public opinion with no recourse. That is totally wrong.

"There has never been one shred of tangible evidence that he ever used these substances and yet he is being slandered today,'' said Hardin, who called McNamee a "troubled man."

While the records will surely stand, several stars could pay the price in Cooperstown, much the way Mark McGwire was kept out of the Hall of Fame this year merely because of steroids suspicion.

"If there were problems, I wanted them revealed," Selig said. "If there were individuals who engaged in wrongdoing, I wanted those facts to come to light. If there were recommendations that would improve our drug testing program, I wanted to hear them.

"His report is a call to action. And I will act."

Mitchell said the problems didn't develop overnight and there was plenty of blame to go around.

What a stinking, nasty mess this is...

Hard to say what the longterm repercussions of this will be. Some think this is the end of it, and that America only cares about opening day next April. I tend to believe that great harm has been done to the game, and that a purge is probably inevitable, including at the Hall of Fame.

Chief
12-13-2007, 05:15 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/SeniorChieftain/toon121407b.gif

Waterbuffalo
12-13-2007, 06:20 PM
Nice!

Chief
12-13-2007, 09:22 PM
Sad, perhaps...

Waterbuffalo
12-13-2007, 10:24 PM
Well lets hope in 10 years or so that this finally does end.. But why do I feel a recycled history moment going to be happening again in this sport around drugs?

Chief
12-14-2007, 06:26 AM
In reality, there is only so much that the Baseball Commissioner can do about this. At some point you have to draw a line...is it worth punishing those players who lied to a Grand Jury? I say yes. Is it worth removing consideration for those players for the Hall of fame? Again I say, yes.

Is it worthwhile going back ten or more years to punish players who are no longer in the game? If so, do you invalidate all of the games they played in?? There are at least five Championships over the last ten years that involved a bunch of different players who are on that list too. Do we go back and invalidate those World Series wins too??

At the same time, the player's Union has opposed every single thing that was ever suggested about monitoring players for things like Human Growth Hormone. The Union has played a significant role in nurturing an environment where this kind of activity went on, because the players knew they could get away with it.

This could easily turn into an unmanagable slippery slope, and I'm sure that the Commissioner of Baseball Bud Selig has been aware of that for some time. I'll be interested to see what kind of plan he comes up with to put this behind.

Waterbuffalo
12-14-2007, 07:47 AM
If the baseball commissioner or its players union fails to fix this, the congress will step. They have been rumbling on other issues related to sports entertainment in the areas of taxation and some other stuff.