PDA

View Full Version : Bush to nominate retired federal judge Michael Mukasey to replace Gonzales


Chief
09-16-2007, 06:41 PM
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003887653_webmukasey16.html

WASHINGTON — President Bush has settled on Michael B. Mukasey, a retired federal judge from New York, to replace Alberto Gonzales as attorney general and will announce his selection Monday, a person familiar with the president's decision said Sunday evening.

Mukasey, who has handled terrorist cases in the U.S. legal system for more than a decade, would become the nation's top law enforcement officer if confirmed by the Senate. Mukasey has the support of some key Democrats, and it appeared Bush was trying to avoid a bruising confirmation battle.

The 66-year-old New York native, who is a judicial adviser to GOP presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani, would take charge of a Justice Department where morale is low following months of investigations into the firings of nine U.S. attorneys and Gonzales' sworn testimony on the Bush administration's terrorist surveillance program.

Key lawmakers, Democrats and Republicans alike, had questioned Gonzales' credibility and competency after he repeatedly testified that he could not recall key events.

The White House refused to comment Sunday. The person familiar with Bush's decision refused to be identified by name because the nomination had not been officially announced.

Bush supporters say Mukasey, who was chief judge of the high-profile courthouse in Manhattan for six years, has impeccable credentials, is a strong, law-and-order jurist, especially on national security issues, and will restore confidence in the Justice Department.

Bush critics see the Mukasey nomination as evidence of Bush's weakened political clout as he heads into the final 15 months of his presidency. It's unclear how Senate Democrats will view Mukasey's credentials, but early indications are that he will face less opposition than a more hardline, partisan candidate like Ted Olson, who was believed to have been a finalist.

Mukasey has received past endorsements from Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, who is from Mukasey's home state. And in 2005, the liberal Alliance for Justice put Mukasey on a list of four judges who, if chosen for the Supreme Court, would show the president's commitment to nominating people who could be supported by both Democrats and Republicans.

Last week, some Senate Democrats threatened to block the confirmation of Olson, who represented Bush before the Supreme Court in the contested 2000 election. Democratic senators have theorized that Bush might nominate Mukasey, in part, because he wanted to avoid a bruising confirmation battle.

**SCHNIPP**

So much for the "Nominate Ted and Fight" strategery... ::)

Gotta choose your battles these days...

Waterbuffalo
09-17-2007, 04:55 PM
The president is only going to be in office less than a year and a half. This guy is going to be able to change that much in this deparment in that amount of time.

It will be the next nominee who will be the one who does make the needed reforms..

Chief
09-17-2007, 05:08 PM
I beg to differ. The Attorney General is the de facto head of the entire Department of Justice, and one hell of a lot can happen in a year and a half. George W. Bush will be President until January 20th 2009, and needs a functioning Justice Department until then...

Waterbuffalo
09-17-2007, 05:11 PM
Guess you might say it took how long for the democrats to complain about the "Justice Deparment" and its ills?

Guess I'll agree to disagree with you Chief. With the DOJ looks disfunctional at best, its going to take time to clean it up and probably more than 18 months.

Chief
09-17-2007, 05:18 PM
Gonzales never was a real poiticain, and that's what the job really requires these days. The whole issue of the US Attorneys was a red herring of the first degree, and Gonzales's mis-management of the way it was handled was the real issue, not the firings themselves.

USA's serve at the pleasure of the President. Period. He can dismiss them at any time, at his discresion, and for his own reasons that need not be explained to the Congress.

Waterbuffalo
09-18-2007, 01:53 AM
Think we are in agreement that the Gonzalez problem was mismanagement, not any other reason. Looks like the guy who is going to replace him is a federal judge of good standing with both sides of the aisle. lets hope that his confirmation will bring out any new ideas he has for the start of reforming that agency.