View Full Version : 300
Chief
12-09-2006, 06:44 PM
And for those of you who go see Apocalypto, you will get to see the previews of "300", the next movie based on a Frank Miller graphic comicbook...
Think 300 as in the year 300. Think Sin City in ancient Sparta. Swords instead of Machine Guns. :o
If the movie is half as good as the preview is, this is going to be a blockbuster of a movie.
Spring 2007
;D
Chief
03-01-2007, 11:16 AM
Almost here!
Opens March 9th....
Here's a link to the latest trailer.....turn it up....
;D
http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/300/trailer1/large.html
karma
03-05-2007, 09:48 AM
Oh my I better get my tickets early? ??? Thanks for the heads up!
Chief
03-05-2007, 11:24 AM
Oh yah! Cinetopia is going to carry it, and I highly recommend seeing it there if you can.
;D
karma
03-05-2007, 02:00 PM
Yep, that's where the kid recommends for the full effect, right?
Chief
03-05-2007, 08:44 PM
I recommend Cinetopia, because I don't have to sit with my chin on my knees to watch the movie. It's also nice to have an adult beverage with a movie ....
;D
Chief
03-12-2007, 06:25 AM
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/r-rated-300-makes-huge-numbers-25-mil-friday-for-expected-60-mil-wkd/
SUNDAY AM: It was a bloodbath at the U.S. box office this weekend because of 2007's first bonafide blockbuster. Warner Bros. told me this morning its 'R'-rated 300 about the epic Battle of Thermopylae shattered the record for the biggest March opening ever, and scored the 3rd biggest 'R'-rated movie debut ever, with its $70+ million. (Or, $70.025 mil to be exact, though the studio didn't provide a breakdown.)
Other studios say this 'Gladiator Gore-Fest' raked in $27.7 mil to $28 mil Friday and $24.3 mil to $24.8 mil Saturday and an estimated $16 mil to $17.2 mil Sunday from its 3,103 theaters. Toldja so... I said back on Tuesday that 300 was tracking huge -- even though most of its target audience fell asleep during that history lesson in school. But rival studios were complaining to me this weekend that the much-buzzed pic was pitched heavily to the youth market despite the 'R' rating. (This is what gets Hollywood in trouble with Congress. In 2000, entertainment moguls had to explain to the Senate Commerce Committee, led by John McCain, why Tinseltown targets its sex and violence fare to kids.)
But Warner's maintains "we were very careful to market to 17 and above, in accordance with the R rating." Helped by omnipresent advertising on the Internet and video game sites and comic book conventions and MySpace, this CGI extravaganza was sold out even for Thursday midnight sneaks, including all 57 IMAX theaters. This pic from the creator of Sin City was cheap to make and shot in only 60 days and cast with no stars, so it ends up one of Warner's most profitable pics. So who was seeing 300? I'm told that the audience was about 60/40 male-female and about evenly split younger/older, with playability exceeding the norms on all quadrants in terms of both 'definite recommends' and the top two recommend boxes.
Warner Bros. moguls were thrilled after enduring expensive disappointment after disappointment in 2006 (Poseidon, Superman Returns, The Lake House, The Ant Bully, Lady In The Water, etc.) with the notable exceptions of Oscar winner Happy Feet from director George Miller and The Departed from Martin Scorsese. Especially with a per screen average of $9,045 Friday and $7,965 Saturday, 300 easily overtook the current record-holder for March: 2002's Ice Age and its $46.3 mil take. That was accomplished Saturday! (FYI: Since 2006 sequel Ice Age: The Meltdown opened March 31-April 2 with $68 mil, it can't be considered a March weekend record-holder. But 300 surged past that, too.)
Though 300's haul is amazing considering its 'R' rating: it placed behind only Matrix Reloaded at $91.7 mil in May 2003 and The Passion of the Christ at $83.8 mil in February 2004 but bested Hannibal at $51 mil in February 2001.
;D
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.