Chief
08-08-2007, 05:52 PM
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/08/supreme_court_confirmation_hea.html
For most of our history, despite the Supreme Court's important role, Justices nominated by a President were subject to little scrutiny beyond character and ability. As several Senate Judiciary Committee members noted in the confirmation of Chief Justice Roberts, before 1955 nominees almost never appeared before the Committee. The nomination was simply voted on in the Senate. Indeed, Justice Minton (a Truman appointee) was confirmed despite his having turned down an invitation to appear before the Committee.
**SCHNIPP**
A long, but very interesting and thoroughly researched article on a very novel idea IMHO...well worth a read and a bookmark for the next one in the series...
;D
For most of our history, despite the Supreme Court's important role, Justices nominated by a President were subject to little scrutiny beyond character and ability. As several Senate Judiciary Committee members noted in the confirmation of Chief Justice Roberts, before 1955 nominees almost never appeared before the Committee. The nomination was simply voted on in the Senate. Indeed, Justice Minton (a Truman appointee) was confirmed despite his having turned down an invitation to appear before the Committee.
**SCHNIPP**
A long, but very interesting and thoroughly researched article on a very novel idea IMHO...well worth a read and a bookmark for the next one in the series...
;D