PDA

View Full Version : Thursday's Daily Patella Chapter One..."Once again the Plot thickens"


Chief
08-02-2007, 05:34 AM
http://www.westerndredging.org/cgi-bin/mail.cgi/archive/Local/20070801221147/

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/SeniorChieftain/network1.jpg

Date: August 1st, 2007


An open letter to the Columbian, (Lou Brancaccio, Jonathon Nelson, Julia Anderson)

My apologies. I erred. I wrongly assumed that if anyone was to report such an important bit of information it would be the Columbian. I do however find it difficult to believe that the Columbian did not receive a copy of what appears to be a Port of Vancouver Press Release.

The article in which the port Director made statements that the port had already purchased the Alcoa/Evergreen property and had the funding in place for the Rail project before the IDD levy was imposed and the petition signatures gathered that I referred to in my last email was published in the Daily Insider on February 21, 2007 not the Columbian. (see below)

The fact remains however that the Port Director did,at a public meeting, make those statements and as the primary media outlet in the city, it remains my opinion, that the Columbian has a duty and obligation to its reader to ask the Port, and publish their response about what happened between the day those statement were made and the property tax levy imposed.

If the Port did not purchase the property or have the funding as Mr. Paulson stated, why were those statement made. If they did, why impose a 132% property tax increase.

It is my opinion that the port's long range creditability is at stake here.

If Mr. Paulson was telling the truth during his Port Report, we should not now be having a vote on whether or not to increase our property taxes by 132 %.

Don't let the rascals tax you out of your home.

Larry Patella

Here is the Article in Question.

----- Original Message -----
From: Tony Bacon
To: Daily Insider Subscriber
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:09 PM
Subject: Insider, Wednesday, Feb. 21, 2007

dailyinsider.info

WEDNESDAY, Feb. 21, 2007
Print Edition Back Issues Search Free Unclassified Ads Arts & Films Contact


Port of Vancouver bustling, projects
will double employment to 32,000 jobs

Port of Vancouver executive director Larry Paulson today opened his Port Report to a packed breakfast audience in the Red Lion Hotel at the Quay, declaring that “the port’s role is to provide family wage jobs, jobs that pay enough to buy a house.”

“We believe we can create enough of these jobs to help form a defining moment for our community,: Paulson continued, “Imagine a time when thousands more Clark County residents can work close to home. We believe that time is now.”

According to Paulson, the port today contributes over 15,500 jobs, with 6,000 of those jobs directly on port property.

“The Port of Vancouver could potentially generate another 15,000 additional jobs resulting from development of Columbia Gateway, the newly bought Alcoa/Evergreen site on the Columbia River and the new light industrial properties in Fruit Valley,” Paulson said.

The Alcoa/Evergreen property was bought this month by the port and is being financed by a property tax-based industrial bond issue.

The port recently initiated a $60- to $70-million rail improvement project, being financed both privately and by the port, that will provide direct access to all port tenants. The project, to be completed in 2009, will result in a dramatic decrease in rail congestion on the west coast and on lines leading from Vancouver to Chicago in the east and Houston in the south, Paulson reported.

Paulson declared the port profitable in 2006. Revenue has more than doubled since 2001, he said. Last year saw a 50 percent increase in steel imports and a 13 percent increase in scrap steel exports.

Although part of the Red Lion Hotel at the Quay, which leases its site at Terminal 1 from the port, is potentially in the path of a new I-5 Interstate Bridge, the hotel spent $1.7 million in upgrades to the facility and its 160 rooms, for which the port named it winner of its Facilities Improvement-of-the-Year Award.

Chief
08-02-2007, 06:18 AM
For the record, the good news is that this is the first time in the several years I have known <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> that I have ever seen him admit that he might have been wrong about something.

The bad news is, he merely reidentified the source for his triple rant yesterday, and opened fire at the Port of Vancouver again.

I believe he has crossed the rubicon of reality in his Crusade against the Port of Vancouver, and is regularly weaving in and out of psychosis in his "Local Mailing List". The Port of Vancouver has to take the high road on this, and I understand why they are not out actively rebutting <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a>. It would be poor form at the very least for a Commissioner to get their hands dirty like that.

That's why they have me.

For a while, the most common reaction to <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> that I heard from people was "Who is listening?" Over the past few weeks we have found out that in addition to the 3000 or so addressees on "The Local Mailing List", the Greater Vancouver Chamber of Commerce has listened to <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a>, so have the League of Women Voters, several Neighborhood Associations, and the columbian considers <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> a handy source for "the opposition view".

Keep in mind that one of <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella's</a> permanent addressees for his "Local Mailing List" articles is the "Letters" editor at the columbian. <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> is the most frequently printed letter writer that the columbian has, because he literally floods them with his rantings. If the columbian publishes a letter from <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> you can positively rest assured that John Laird personally had to edit it, so that it made some sort of sense.

The problem with that is once Larid finishes editing <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella's</a> writing, the meaning has changed significantly from what his original work said. That gives <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> more credibility than he deserves, and makes it appear that he is more rational than he really is. What ends up being published is Laird's work, not the real <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a>.

It seems that <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> has a small band of followers, but none of them so far have spoken up to support any of the rantings he has made to date. I post them here, because although they are in public view, you cannot comment on what he says at Westen Dredging's website. By putting them up here, anybody can weigh in and comment on them if they choose, and I find it interesting (and puzzling) that not one of his friends or followers has spoken out in support of him yet.

As is my usual custom here at Clarkblog, after the Election, I will post an after action report, along with some analysis of what happens once the ballots are all counted. I believe the IDD Levy is going to be the defining issue in local politics for some time to come. Who the winners and the losers are is yet to be seen, but that day is coming soon...

Stout Hearts!!

tefen
08-02-2007, 07:49 AM
Had a small neighborhood meeting last night, and I got the impression from those present that they felt the port was in the wrong. Not a whole lot of conversation about it, but they pointed to the upcoming groundbreaking as putting the cart before the horse in the spirit of showmanship to buy votes. A statement which doesn't bear well given all the other recent announcements and claims from Patella that such announcements are to buy votes.

One person present said "if nothing else comes of this levy, at least it's made the port a better neighbor." The general public certainly knows more about what they're doing down there now.

Chief
08-02-2007, 01:24 PM
Certainly the groundbreaking ceremony for the East Vancouver Rail Access Project is a very big deal, and the Port has every right, (and I would argue a responsibility) to make sure the Public sees this as a unique time worthy of recognition. It's big enough for Patty Murray to be the keynote speaker, so that should tell you something.

If anyone will be willing to step forward and show me the money they received from any one of the Port Commissioners in return for their vote, I will be glad to entertain that conversation; but until someone steps forward, I will leave that discussion to <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a>...

Seriously, how do grown adults come up with a notion as patently untrue, baseless, illegal, and outright stupid as to suggest that anyone at the Port is trying to buy their vote??

Yes, this is a politiical opportunity for the Port to celebrate the first step that will open the Columbia Gateway. I recommend that some of your neighbors come down to terminal 1 at the Quay for the ceremony next Tuesday. I believe that in ten years, we will all look back and realize that despite the raving from some quarters, that this was the key to securing a big chunk of the County economy for the next century...

tefen
08-02-2007, 01:59 PM
Maybe buy wasn't the right word. Sway votes. A lot of showmanship to sway votes.

I'm with you, I think we need this investment in our future.

Chief
08-02-2007, 02:44 PM
I will concede a display of showmanship on the Part of the Port. Ground breakings as momentous as this, deserve a shot of pomp and circumstance.....it can't beat a good Ship Christening and launching though, especially when they slide that baby smokin' down the ways...

Now THATS a Show...

;D

Chief
08-03-2007, 05:10 PM
I have it on good authority that in Monday's edition of the Daily Insider, Publisher Tony Bacon will publish a correction to his article that ran on February 21, 2007 that <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> twisted into a mis-quote from the columbian that started this whole bru-ha-ha in the first place.

That doesn't surprize me at all, since Tony is a decent guy who runs a quality newsletter.

I also have it on good authority that the columbian has also been informed as to the specifiic details of what has transpired, including the mis-quotes, and mis-information about a current ballot issue, and that there is no expectation that the columbian will publish any further comments about any of the sources that they choose to use for their reports.

No surprize there either.

Let's hope we can enjoy the blissful silence of a peaceful weekend.

Don't forget to vote!!

Stout hearts...

Waterbuffalo
08-03-2007, 06:41 PM
Cannot agree with you more Cheif. Tony creates one of the few newspapers, journals or things that come out of Clark County.

If there was a way to get Pamplin Media Group (KPAM radio, Portland Tribune and several community newspapers in Oregon) to produce an insert for Vancouver/Clark County residences in the Portland Tribune, wouldn't life be grand?

Chief
08-06-2007, 04:49 PM
Via the Daily insider

Don’t believe everything you read in the newspapers

On Feb. 21, 2007, the Daily Insider, reporting on the Port of Vancouver’s annual Port Report, said in part: “‘The Port of Vancouver could potentially generate another 15,000 additional jobs resulting from development of Columbia Gateway, the newly bought Alcoa/Evergreen site on the Columbia River and the new light industrial properties in Fruit Valley,’ Paulson said.

“The Alcoa/Evergreen property was bought this month by the port and is being financed by a property tax-based industrial bond issue.”

The Daily Insider’s story was wrong on both counts.

In handout issued during the Port Report, the port said: “Earlier this month the port signed letters of intent to purchase the 218-acre site that previously housed the Alcoa, and then Vanalco, aluminum smelter. The site could provide nearly 1,900 direct jobs and have a ripple effect that generates another 2,700 jobs in our community, according to projections by a national economic consultant. The commission voted to implement its final option for an Industrial Development District tax levy to raise funds for the $48.25 million purchase and improvements.”

The port has not yet bought the Alcoa/Evergreen property. A property-tax-based bond issue to be financed by a six-year special levy was approved by the board of port commissioners, but that was set aside after a group of citizens collected enough signatures to put the levy on the ballot.

Voters within the port district are now deciding the fate of the special levy. Voting on the special levy concludes at 8 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 21.

The Daily Insider regrets having made a factual error in reporting that has been used by opponents of the port’s proposed Industrial Development District tax levy as a claim that the port already owns the Alcoa/Evergreen property.

Waterbuffalo
08-06-2007, 06:35 PM
Cheif:

When all people can do is just put out rag pieces with out any factual basis for it, it reminds me of the little kid who didn't get a lollipop..

Time to just put him aside, tell Patella to move on from the Port issue in about a week or so is going to be decided and to move on.

Better yet, have him run for mayor of the City of Vancouver? <evil grin..> Couldn't be any worse?