PDA

View Full Version : Your Daily Patella for Wednesday...Cascade Larry's words to Women Voters


Chief
08-01-2007, 05:24 AM
http://www.westerndredging.org/cgi-bin/mail.cgi/archive/Local/20070731211457/

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/SeniorChieftain/network1.jpg

Was The Port Lying to US on Feb 21st or are they lying to us now?

Date: July 31st, 2007

Below is a draft of the statement I made at the League of Women Voters Tonight. Below that is an article Published in the columbian on February 21, 2007 in which Port Director, Larry Paulson stated that the port had already purchased the Alcoa/Evergreen Property and had made financial arrangements to complete in 2009 the Rail Road Expansion. Please read both carefully.

L. M. Patella
CDR USN (ret)

Comments made at League of Women Voters debate.

Why should you vote no on the on the Port of Vancouver’s Industrial Development District Levy. The answers are quite simple. First of all The Port of Vancouver attempted, without your vote, to impose a property tax rate that represents a 132% increase over the current tax rate the Port now collects. Only a successful petition drive by the people has allowed your voice to be heard. Second the Port, in my opinion, is misleading the voter.

In what appears to be a good old fashion “deal con-cocked in the proverbial smoked filled backroom”, Port Commissioners met on a Friday and signed a deal on the following Monday without seeking any input from the taxpayers and imposed a 132% property tax increase that would net them some 78 million dollars to buy a 48 million dollars property that has been on the market for years with no other apparent buyers.

Why? The Port’s answer is they want to create jobs. Yet, there appears to be some confusion on just how many jobs will be created. Larry Paulson claims 15,000 jobs, Val Ogden 6000 new Family wage jobs, The columbian is reporting 2000, and others are looking at 1853.
The port also has also neglected to inform the voters that the rail project they are proposing and the purchase of the Alcoa/Evergreen property may already, as reported in the columbian on February 21, 2007 be a done deal.

And if it is not a done deal what happened between Larry Paulson’s announcements made during his annual Port Report to a packed audience at an Inn at the Quay Breakfast and the hastily put together IDD Property Tax Levy weeks later. That report was published in the columbian on February 21, 2007.

Here are a couple of quotes from Mr. Paulson’ Report: A Copy of the Article is available is provided below.

“The Port of Vancouver could potentially generate another 15,000 additional jobs resulting from the development of columbian Gateway, the newly bought Alcoa/Evergreen site on the Columbia River and the new light industrial properties in Fruit Valley”,

“The Alcoa/Evergreen property was bought this month (February 2007) by the port and is being finance by a property tax-based industrial bond issue”

“The Port recently initiated a $60-to $70-million rail improvement project, being financed both privately and by the port, that will provide direct access to all port tenants. The Project, to be completed in 2009, will result in a dramatic decrease in rail congestion on the west coast and on lines leading from Vancouver to Chicago in the east and Houston in the South”.

These ladies and gentlemen are Pre IDD Levy Decisions and Pre Petition Drive statements. If I were, an attorney my next question would be, was the port lying to us in February 2007 or are they lying to us now. What happened Between February 21, 2007 and that closed door meeting on a Friday night weeks later that caused the Port to rush into a Monday agreement to Raise our Property Taxes. What ever it was, we are not being told.

In any event, it makes all the port’s and Citizens for strong Economy claims, statements, TV Ads, posters, Flyers, and yard Signs suspect.
Paulson also was quoted in the columbian as declaring the Port profitable in 2006. Revenue’s he said have more than doubled since 2001. Why then do they now need to raise our taxes.

And last but not least a no vote on the Ports outrageous attempt to impose new taxes without a vote of the people will send to all elected officials that they should not impose tax increases without first securing public input and comment.

Your Vote No is a must. At the rate your property taxes and other taxes are increasing you will, in the not too distant future, no longer own your home; you will be renting it from the Government.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Port of Vancouver bustling, projects
will double employment to 32,000 jobs

Published in the columbian February 21, 2007

Port of Vancouver executive director Larry Paulson today opened his Port Report to a packed breakfast audience in the Red Lion Hotel at the Quay, declaring that “the port’s role is to provide family wage jobs, jobs that pay enough to buy a house.”

“We believe we can create enough of these jobs to help form a defining moment for our community,: Paulson continued, “Imagine a time when thousands more Clark County residents can work close to home. We believe that time is now.”

According to Paulson, the port today contributes over 15,500 jobs, with 6,000 of those jobs directly on port property.

“The Port of Vancouver could potentially generate another 15,000 additional jobs resulting from development of Columbia Gateway, the newly bought Alcoa/Evergreen site on the Columbia River and the new light industrial properties in Fruit Valley,” Paulson said.

"The Alcoa/Evergreen property was bought this month by the port and is being financed by a property tax-based industrial bond issue".

"The port recently initiated a $60- to $70-million rail improvement project, being financed both privately and by the port, that will provide direct access to all port tenants. The project, to be completed in 2009, will result in a dramatic decrease in rail congestion on the west coast and on lines leading from Vancouver to Chicago in the east and Houston in the south", Paulson reported.

Paulson declared the port profitable in 2006. Revenue has more than doubled since 2001, he said. Last year saw a 50 percent increase in steel imports and a 13 percent increase in scrap steel exports.

Although part of the Red Lion Hotel at the Quay, which leases its site at Terminal 1 from the port, is potentially in the path of a new I-5 Interstate Bridge, the hotel spent $1.7 million in upgrades to the facility and its 160 rooms, for which the port named it winner of its Facilities Improvement-of-the-Year Award.

CouvCoug
08-01-2007, 06:41 AM
This just keeps getting worse and worse. Commander Patella seems to have no idea what he's talking about...where are these so-called "facts" coming from Commander? This is old-school mudslinging at its best (or would that be worst?).

Chief
08-01-2007, 06:53 AM
The article he is referring to obviously mis-quoted the Director, since the property has obviously not been purchased. I did a cursury search of the columbian's website earlier and did not turn up the original article quickly. I will return there later and try harder to find the article he cites.

The other side of this is that <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> is directly accusing Executive Director Larry Paulson of lying, and did so in front of the League of Women Voters last night. I have said before that there can be no more serious charge against a person than lying in the performance of their official duties.

Director Paulson works for the Commissioners, and I would think that any official accusations made against their Director would be a serious matter indeed. Since <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> is making his charges against the Port repeatedly in public, I believe some sort of an official statement against this might be in order.

I'm working on a more in depth analysis of this, and will have more to add as the day wears on.

Developing...

tefen
08-01-2007, 07:41 AM
What kind of word is "con-cocked"? Doesn't he have more respect in the presence of Women Voters? I'm guessing he meant concocted, but that misspelling seems pretty deliberate.

I can't find the columbian article either, nor the Port Report mentioned above (though I don't really know where to look). I did find the Press Release on the Port of Vancouver's website which says it signed a letter of intent with Alcoa contingent upon the levy. Dated 2/9/2007.... I suspect this is the news the columbian was reporting on.

http://www.portvanusa.com/news/releases/2007/2_9_07.htm


Oh wait, special meeting February 7th, 2007: http://www.portvanusa.com/about/mtg_archive/2007/2_7_07.htm

<i>Mr. Paulson reported the <b>proposed purchase</b> of the Alcoa and Evergreen properties would allow development of about 218 acres of heavy industrial zoned land.</i>


Did Mr. Patella perhaps mis-remember? Or maybe the Columbian mis-quoted, another possibility.

tefen
08-01-2007, 08:03 AM
The closest thing to a possible method of acquisition beyond the levy that I can find is this story in the Vancouver Business Journal dated June 8th.

http://www.vbjusa.com/stories/2007-06-08/crossroads_at_the_port.html

tefen
08-01-2007, 08:22 AM
From clarkblog...

http://clarkblog.org/index.php/topic,635.0.html <i>Port officials announced Friday they have signed an agreement to buy 218 acres from Alcoa Inc. and Evergreen Aluminum LLC.</i>


Alright, I'm giving up. I can not find anything like what Patella says he's read. I don't think anything short of a visit to the library or the columbian itself will be able to come up with it. The only thing I can figure is that he's confused "signed an agreement to buy" with "bought". He should watch the CVTV show entitled <a href="http://www.cityofvancouver.us/cvtv/cvtvarchive/City_Public_Events/2007_Events/Development_%20Review_101_2-6-07.wmv">Development Review 101 (link to movie file)</a>. Developers often sign an agreement to buy which says "I may want your land, so don't try to sell it to anyone else" up to a year or more in advance of making a decision whether to buy it or not.

loislives
08-01-2007, 10:38 AM
The last time I posted at Clarkblog, my question was "who is this guy?!" I used to find his rants amusing in that they were so obviously over-the-top inaccurate. (I also LOVE the reference to the character from the movie Network screaming "I'm as mad as hell.....and I'm not going to take it anymore..." whenever you click on the name Larry Patella. Screamingly funny and extremely appropriate!) However, my next question is how does this clown get an audience with the League of Women Voters? Also, is there any way to get in touch with Mr. Patella directly (e-mail?) I'm getting really tired of the constant reference to the 132% increase in your property taxes, when in fact this translates to about 9 bucks and change on the average Clark County home.

Did Larry Patella run for Port Commissioner at one time and lost? Why is he so dead set against the Port of Vancouver wanting to do something that actually benefits the community? One can only hope that his rabid opposition works as well for the Port as did his efforts on behalf of opposing the building of the downtown Vancouver Hilton. He was against it, and yet, there is stands; a testament to how totally ineffective this man really is.

Chief
08-01-2007, 11:01 AM
I can't find anything either. I did a pretty thorough search on the columbian's website, and came up with anything but the article he's talking about. <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> is no doubt mis-quoting an article that was written to address some other subject, in any case I have no reason to believe he is any more accurate on this than he has been on anything else.

It isn't just the Port of Vancouver that <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> is opposed to either Lois....he has had a one dispute or another going for years with the City of Vancouver, or Mayor Royce Pollard, or Clark County, or any number of State Agencies over the years.

Remember the Library Bond?? Who do you suppose lead the charge against that?? That's right...it was <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> who led the band on the Pornography filters for two years, and because he was such a predictable on-hit wonder, the people who supported the Libraries switched issues, knowing full well Patella was incapable of reacting to it, found almost exactly the number of votes they needed for passage, and voila!!! One big fat Library Bond for Killian Pacific.

{And no Ed, I have not found out yet who the phantom $5 Million Dollar donor is...}

As Lois correctly points out, if it were not for <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a>, and some of the very same people who are blindly behind him now, we would not have a "People's Hilton". If <a href="http://frogstar.soylentgeek.com/wav/mad-hell.wav">Larry Patella</a> had listened to something besides his own voice, his supporters would have saved themselves a whopping legal bill to defend the indefensible.

How long are you people going to continue to listen to this fool??

Is this truly the best you people can do??

Pathetic!