PDA

View Full Version : New Cell Phone Flag Tower at the cc fairgrounds


Waterbuffalo
08-10-2008, 11:26 PM
http://www.columbian.com/news/localNews/2008/08/08112008_Off-Beat-Effort-to-earn-cell-tower-revenue-never-flags.cfm

Monday, August 11, 2008

O say, can you see the cell tower?

If you visited the Clark County Fair this year, maybe you looked up to admire the impressive new American flag standing out against the blue summer sky.

The flag is waving from a new 150-foot flagpole that is towering over the fair’s grandstand and the carnival rides.

“Towering” is a very appropriate word, as it turns out. That’s because the new flagpole is doing double duty.

“It’s a working cell tower disguised as a flagpole,” said Justin Kobluk, executive director of the Clark County Event Center at the Fairgrounds.

Cellular equipment is getting compact enough now to fit inside a relatively narrow space, without a bulky dish or antenna marring the skyline, Kobluk said.

The new Old Glory is an eye-catching 38 feet wide by 20 feet deep. That’s the biggest flag they could install without having it hamper cell-phone service.

A bigger flag would flap even more energetically in a strong wind. That, in turn, would create a swaying at the top of the flagpole, and, “That would interfere with the cellular signal,” Kobluk said.

There are other aspects to the flagpole/cell tower, Kobluk said. It provides a new landmark along Interstate 5.

And, it’s a nice source of income for the event center, with AT&T paying $18,000 a year for the site.

Camou-flagged

This has become something of an art form, according to a story a few years ago on the networkworld.com Web site.

Writer Denise Dubie noted that, “About a quarter of the estimated 130,000 cellular towers across the U.S. are camouflaged, some as trees, others as flagpoles and still others as church steeples.”

There’s another disguise that is popular in some parts of the country, but the Clark County Fairgrounds is not really the place to “plant” a towering concrete cactus.

Waterbuffalo
08-10-2008, 11:35 PM
One of the reasons I am posting this, is this might be a way for the city of Vancouver could generate some income with obvious restrictions for safety, design and other things on some of the public land?

There was a thread or discussion about this at the city council meetings a few months back on this issue of putting a cell tower or two on top of the water towers near Andresen or Devine Road? But because of 9/11 and other security concerns, I think this is still up for debate, research and many other things, along with bugs and negotiations that need to be worked out.

I bet there are probably a bunch of places that this might be an added bonus? How about putting one or two at the General Andersen, city of Vancouver vehicle storage, mechanics and maintenance shed. No, it does not have to look like an eyesore.

But this might be a way to bring in much needed revenue plus help the cell phone companies put up much needed tower space? How about Firstenburg, new Downtown library, Marshall Center, Clark College, etc. There is just a minor amount of locations that?

No, they do not, I repeat, do not have to look like eyesores... May be they could add cameras for WashDOT to monitor traffic along I-5? Put one of these in a high crime area of Vancouver with cameras to help cut down on Crime?

Oh the possibilities are endless. But alas, they'll be called eyesores, brain cancer radiators, electric wave-brain disruptors?