PDA

View Full Version : McKenna faces state Democrat complaint


Waterbuffalo
07-22-2008, 07:02 PM
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008065171_mckenna22m.html

Bob Young Seattle Times

Democrats have filed a complaint with state-election watchdogs alleging that TV public-service announcements featuring Attorney General Rob McKenna are improper election advertisements for McKenna's re-election campaign.

McKenna, a Republican seeking a second term this year, calls the complaint "ridiculous" and hypocritical. He notes that Gov. Christine Gregoire has appeared in similar public-service announcements.

"The bottom line is no law has been violated," McKenna said.

At issue are three public-service announcements, or PSAs, that showcase McKenna. None of them was made with public money.

One ad was sponsored by BECU, the credit union, and warns about identity theft, while another was paid for by the liquor industry and discourages drunken driving. The third PSA is about Internet safety and was produced by the National Cable and Telecommunications Association.

The Internet-safety ad, still airing on Comcast cable-TV stations around the state, is expected to end in September, said Comcast spokesman Steve Kipp.

In its complaint to the state Public Disclosure Commission (PDC), the state Democratic Party claims the ads violate several election rules: They use McKenna's office or title to assist his campaign; they have a value that exceeds the state's $1,600 limit on campaign contributions; and, most important, they aren't public-service announcements as defined by state law.

That law says a candidate must arrange to appear in a PSA at least six months before launching a campaign. If not, the ad likely would be considered an election message and should be reported as a campaign contribution.

McKenna said he agreed to appear in the ads in 2005 or 2006 — his staff hasn't pinpointed the exact dates yet — long before he announced his re-election campaign last November.

The complaint doesn't specify any dates and says only that it's "reasonable to assume" the ads were not arranged more than six months before McKenna declared his candidacy.

The debate falls into a gray area, said Kathleen Hall Jamieson, an expert on political communication and director of the Annenberg Center for Public Policy of the University of Pennsylvania.

Jamieson said such ads help create a good impression of candidates and are essentially contributions to their campaigns. But, she said, it's reasonable for elected officials to appear in such ads.

"The question," she said, "becomes when does the campaign season actually begin?"

Washington state law is not completely clear on that, said Lori Anderson, a spokeswoman for the PDC. Anderson said the commission staff will review rules to see how the start of a campaign is defined.

McKenna's Democratic opponent, John Ladenburg, has proposed a ban on all appearances by elected officials in PSAs during an election year. Ladenburg, the Pierce County executive, said he has appeared in Comcast public-service announcements that wish viewers happy holidays.

Kipp, the Comcast spokesman, said the cable company also has done PSAs with former Gov. Gary Locke about the environment and education, and with Gregoire's husband, Mike, about the hiring of veterans.

Republican Party state Chairman Luke Esser lashed out at Democrats and Ladenburg, saying they are "so desperate to shock Ladenburg's faltering campaign back to life that they don't mind serving up a huge helping of hypocrisy with their trumped-up charges."

Waterbuffalo
07-22-2008, 07:12 PM
This is one of the few times in the recent year that I thought the local news media could not be outdone.

But to file a complaint about Rob Mckenna, the state attorney general on PSA endorsements? That tackle some of the best and most need reasons and issues that effect our state?

If this had been Christine Gregiore, I would have personally defended her about the same PSA style things to get out the word on state issues that effect us all but to do this with an election year complaint?

This is just pure election year partisanship to slow Rob's popularity. Now that the state democrats are losing some of their stalwart legislators in Olympia, they have to play and pander with these games for one of the top election seats representing us on the Supreme Court, talking to federal delegations and being the state top enforcer?

This kid is one of the shiny, golden boys who "gets it" and "gets things done." Not like some of the upper crust of the state house leadership that continues to block much needed transportation projects, changes in education and a long list of things that never seem to get done.

To pop this up now because they have a continuing to faltering Pierce County candidate that's not popular and suspect that will continue to do the same old, same old..