PDA

View Full Version : Face LIFT: Tacoma


Waterbuffalo
05-18-2008, 06:21 AM
Thought some of the regulars here at Clarkblog would be interested in this article from a Blog off Crosscut. Its basically proposing using the lift program like the City of Vancouver is doing with the Gramor development for some work and improvements (Tacoma is, not Vancouver.)

So here is where I found it. (Thank you Crosscut.)

Please go to this site there is a lot of links and a couple maps on the subject.

http://tacomadowntown.blogspot.com/2008/05/city-seeks-state-funds-for-downtown-and.html

"City Seeks State Funds for Downtown and Dome District Improvements

The Tacoma City Council has announced plans to pursue Local Infrastructure Financing Tool (LIFT) funds from the State of Washington. As part of the LIFT requirements the Council has proposed to designate downtown Tacoma and the Dome District as a Revenue Development Area (RDA).

LIFT is a variation of Tax Increment Financing (TIF). Although TIF is used in 48 states, the Washington State Constitution prohibits the lending of state credit, and thus the TIF tool. In other states TIF is a method for local jurisdictions to leverage future gains in property taxes to invest in current infrastructure improvements and other economic development initiatives. TIF harnesses the increase in property tax revenue from a growing and redeveloping area to repay bonds that financed the improvements.

Alternatively, LIFT is a community development tool that was approved by the Washington State legislature in 2006. LIFT allows selected local governments to take advantage of tax revenue generated by private investment in a designated RDA to make payments on bonds used to finance public infrastructure improvements. Specifically, LIFT provides up to $6 million annually in redirected state retail sales taxes to help pay for public infrastructure projects that are funded with at least an equal amount of local redirected property taxes. The redirected property tax must be comprised of new regular property tax revenues from new construction within the RDA.

If Tacoma is selected for LIFT funds, up to $1 million per year for 25 years could be invested in infrastructure projects in downtown and the Dome District. The City anticipates designing and constructing the following public improvements in the RDA:


* Structure(s) to accommodate 1,500 parking spaces

* Right-of-way and streetscape improvements including; streets, sidewalks, crosswalks, lighting, landscaping and traffic controls

* Utility infrastructure

* Sustainable storm drainage


Total costs of the proposed improvements are estimated at $72.3 million. The City will invest approximately $45 million (62%) from its Parking Fund, the Real Estate Excise Tax, the Sewer Enterprise Fund, and local property taxes generated from new development in the RDA. It is anticipated that $14 million (19%) of Federal funds would be appropriated for this project. Beginning July 1, 2011, LIFT funds projected to be generated over 25 years would be used to repay a General Obligation Bond, which would yield an estimated $13.3 million (18%) in net proceeds. LIFT would be used primarily for parking infrastructure as well as right-of-way and streetscape improvements.

The City anticipates that the projected investment in public improvements will act as a catalyst to attract at least $400 million of new private investment in office development and the creation of approximately 2,000 well-paying jobs in international financial services, which is a key industry cluster for the City of Tacoma and the State of Washington, and other fields.


The City Council will hold a public hearing on this isue Tuesday, June 10th, 2008 at 5:30 pm at the City Council Chambers, 747 Market St., 1st floor. The public is invited to comment at the hearing or to submit written inquiries or comments prior to the meeting."

Chief
05-18-2008, 07:11 AM
As you can see, using LIFT is not conducive to awarding tax abatements in the RDA you just set up. That is exactly what the Vancouver City Council has done, by first approving the "City Center Visioning Plan", and then trying to qualify the property for LIFT funds.

If the State gets wind that the properties involved will be eligible for abatements, that should kill it right there...

Waterbuffalo
05-18-2008, 07:14 AM
We'll see. I can suspect that both the City and state are both under the gun this year to get their budgets in order. Its going to be a tall order for both the Mayor, City of Vancouver and Indentity Clark County is going to LIFT passed and permanently in place.

But I have never let my guard down that the "Mayor" has not got some tricks and treats on his chess board.

Chief
05-18-2008, 07:18 AM
The other point to consider is that there are typically 10-12 applicants every year for the 1-2 projects that actually get picked up...

Waterbuffalo
05-18-2008, 07:23 AM
And with those 12 projects, Gramor has to be among the top 10 percent eh? Or say top 95 percent?

Sounds quite wonderful and no wonder why the Port was being asked to endorse and put full support behind this.

I'd love to see what the Port finally and officially says about it.

Because I think the Economic Director for the City of Vancouver is running right now doing every thing he can to get this package wrapped up into a bow for the state and our local citizen's to swallow.

Chief
05-19-2008, 07:11 AM
As I understand it, the Port is being asked because the LIFT application requires a second taxing agency to "co-sign" the application and guarantee the local contribution. Since the County and the City of Vancouver still don't get along, there was nobody other than the Port to ask for this.

Waterbuffalo
05-20-2008, 01:04 AM
So *IF* the City defaults or gets into some financial difficulties, the Port is the one going to takea hit?

Chief
05-20-2008, 04:55 AM
As I understand it, the interlocal agreement that is being discussed, would call for the Port of Vancouver to cover the City's share of the $500,000 annual lacal match to the LIFT funds, if the City should be unable to make it themselves.

The language being used is "if needed", and as long as there are abatements available on those properties, the Port's contribution will be needed...

There are other specifics, but that's it in a nutshell. You really need to go view Eric Holmes' presentation about this during the first 10 minutes of the Port of Vancouver meeting on May 12th. He explains it all, and has several slides that detail the specifics.

Waterbuffalo
05-20-2008, 03:44 PM
Ok, I'll go watch it.. Guess I need to go on "Minutia Patrol." instead of pestering you Chief.

Chief
05-20-2008, 05:27 PM
It's not minutae, it's just easier if you watch that first few minutes of the video.

Waterbuffalo
05-20-2008, 11:18 PM
Will doo...