PDA

View Full Version : Brad Lothspeich's address to the 2008 Clark County Republican Convention


Chief
04-22-2008, 05:56 PM
Reprinted with pleasure, and with the permission of the Candidate.

mrgrn

Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you today.

For those I have not the opportunity to meet yet, I thought I would take a minute and tell you a little bit about myself.

Except while I was away to college I have lived in Clark County my entire life. I graduated from Columbia River High School and attended college at EWU. While I was earning a degree in Business Administration, I joined the Cheney Fire Department as a volunteer. I discovered that my first choice for a career was with the fire service. When I returned home after graduation I was fortunate to be offered a job with CCFD 6 as a firefighter. Over the years I progressed through the ranks and spent the last 9 years of my career as the fire chief. As the leader of Fire District 6, I was responsible for approximately 100 personnel and the operation of an agency protecting over 60,000 residents with a budget in the millions of dollars. Tough decisions had to be made on the administrative level as well as on emergency scenes and I met those challenges. I am currently a manager at The Amphitheater at Clark County. Working in the private sector the past five years have given me a greater perspective with some of the challenges in making a business successful

I have been involved both professionally and as a volunteer in the public process over the years. I enjoy the interaction between those involved to reach creative solutions to our community needs. I have never hesitated to serve on different boards or to provide input to various agencies handling planning issues; I have participated in planning issues with the Vancouver School District. WSU Vancouver, Legacy/Salmon Creek Hospital and many other projects.

My parents instilled a sense of giving back to the community in me at a very young age and showed me by example how rewarding it was. I have been involved with the community through the HDSCBA serving 2 years as it’s president, the Retired Senior Volunteer Program, Little League, the Boy Scouts of America, 25 years of service with the American Red Cross and others. I am currently the chairman of TEAM 99 a group working with the county, local business and neighborhoods to improve HWY 99. I also serving on the Klineline Bridge Outreach Advisory Group to help local neighborhoods and business deal with the closure of the bridge.. I have found involvement in the community to be challenging, educational and rewarding.

There are several issues that are very important to me.

The quality of life we enjoy in Clark County must be protected. We must have safe family-oriented neighborhoods, varied recreational opportunities, strong schools, adequate roads and protection of our natural resources.

Transportation issues At the county level, our transportation issues are simple: we need to focus on safety, congestion, efficiency and making sure our tax dollars address these most central issues. Every transportation dollar must address prioritized projects that reflect these facts and they must be identified and implemented. Are local county transportation dollars spent the most effectively on projects that actually make a difference? Are all arterial traffic lights synchronized for the most effective traffic flow?
We need to make sure these issues are addressed.

Economic development is essential to the health of the county. We must establish a more business friendly environment, expand our economic base and create more family wage jobs in Clark County. That will help reduce pressure on an already over burdened I-5 corridor. Accomplishing this requires the right policies. We need smarter, smaller government. We need to make sure our county’s budget is both efficient and effective. With the decrease in new construction the budget will become tighter in the upcoming years and we need to make sure the budget is accountable and responsible to our citizens.

The county must also work with others in the recruitment of new businesses into our communities while helping with the retention and growth of the businesses that are ready here. Economical growth will help provide more family waged jobs in the county so that many of the 65,000 people who cross the Columbia River each day can have the opportunity to work closer to their homes and families. Less dependency on Oregon for jobs is a win for our citizens. New businesses contribute a higher rate of taxes to local jurisdictions than do homeowners. This will help stabilize property taxes.

I believe in constructive intergovernmental relationships. County government may disagree with city governments but that discourse must be kept in perspective and should always be viewed through the filter of “what’s best for all of the people of Clark County”. Open channels of communication are in the best interest of our community.

Our community’s safety must be a constant priority. Police, Fire and other emergency services and agencies should always be a priority and considered basic services. They should be funded first. We must continue to make sure law enforcement and treatment facilities have the tools they need to get the job done concerning our meth problem and its impacts on all of us: high crime rates, the break up of families and the financial burden of approximately 70 % of our jail space occupied by people who have committed meth-related crimes. We need to strive to make Clark County a “meth-free zone”.

Integrity in public service is very important to me. I believe that open communications and the search for common ground in difficult situations are crucial to finding solutions to the county’s problems.

Working on behalf of our community is a responsibility that I do not take lightly. I have thought a great deal about how to best apply my skills and desire to serve our community. We need strong, honest and open leadership. As your county commissioner I will use my experience and apply my values to move Clark County forward in a positive and prosperous direction.

I have a reputation for integrity, accountability, accessibility and common sense in both my professional and every day life. These attributes will help me serve Clark County as you next commissioner. Together we can secure Clark County’s future greatness as a place to live, work and to raise a family.

To accomplish these goals and others I ask for your support.

Thank you

mojoesmom
04-23-2008, 06:29 AM
Brad had a nice message but lacked the passion that Matt Swindell had when he spoke. Plus Matt has held 2 elected positions (he is still holding an elected seat)...he has a proven track record of winning races. Brad hasn't run yet and Mielke has lost twice for this seat. I still think Matt will do the best job for the county.

Waterbuffalo
04-23-2008, 11:09 AM
We'll have to see. I like Brad but I thought Matt was a little overbearing for my taste.

But to be fair, I'd like to meet them in person before making any commitment if they're in my voting district.

Is it the way of only allowing a CC BoCC seat voters to only vote for that districts seat? What I mean is District 1 would vote for those district 1 board electors and District 2 would vote for district 2 electors and so forth?

Or is it they represent the whole county?

Fisticuffs
04-24-2008, 09:24 AM
Board members first face a primary just in their district, so only those in norht county will narrow the current field of 6 to 2. Then in the general they are voted on county wide.

I'm pretty sure I like Brad the best out of the three. He seems the most informed on the issues, with approaches to them that I like. I was mildly disappointed he didn't talk about the bridge and the casino in his schpiel - I've heard him talk at length on both in a smaller setting before and he really has a grasp on what's going on. Matt was considerably more engaging on stage.

Both Matt and Tom (especially the latter) spend a little too much time reassuring you how conservative they are. That's great, except the County Commissioners have very, very, very little to do with any of the policies they take the pains to remind you of their positions on. Tom Mielke used his convention speech to a) attack Brad and Matt for "coming out of the woodwork" when they haven't been heavily involved in GOP politics before, and b) to defend President Bush. While I applaud the latter sentiment, his speech gave me no reason to support Mielke as CC, especially after he's run and lost twice already.

Matt's problem is he buys into Tom's criticism, and takes pains to point out his Christian values - values that don't really tell me anything about, say, where the urban growth boundary will go. When I listend to Brad, however, and he gets into specifics, I actually see an understanding of the issues facing the county, and a thoughtful application of conservative, pro-growth priciples that goes beyond the sound bites everyone wants to hear.

Part of the process was a vote by the delegates. 25% was necessary to get official access to party resources (mailing lists, etc). Tom got something like 45%. Matt got 25% on the nose. Brad just missed it with 24%. The mystery 4th candidate whose name escapes me got the remaining 6 or so%.

sensibilist
04-24-2008, 10:44 AM
The remaining candidate you're thinking of is Bridget Schwartz I think.

Her site is here: http://bridgetschwarz.typepad.com/

Fisticuffs
04-24-2008, 12:17 PM
Nah, that's the indy. There's another Republican who was at the convention. Since Chief keeps track of all this, I found the article here (http://www.clarkblog.org/vBulletin/showthread.php?t=2023). Name of Robert Nichols.

Fisticuffs
04-24-2008, 12:19 PM
Oh wow... Schwartz is in trouble. Her front page is devoted to the nominating convention she would have needed under the old rules. Apparently she didn't get the memo - no more nominating conventions, and yes she is subject to the primary.

Waterbuffalo
04-24-2008, 07:42 PM
I do remember that gentleman. Very interesting.

But I don't think he's got a chance against Matt or Brad unless he can show he's got a better solutions and can politically maneuver better.

Two of my major concerns that I'd love to get some comment on from "ANY" of the candidates is what are they thinking about the Building and Development interests fighting tooth and nail to get more developable lands in GMA areas outside of the Cities of Clark County. Its the same issue that faced Steve Stuart, Marc Boldt and soon to be former Commissoner Betty Sue Morris.

There are at least *TWO* groups that are fighting any extension of the GMA outside of the City of Vancouver and the City of Camas has a chunk of land to the northwest in its 20 year GMA area that is several times bigger than what the City of Vancouver swallowed in 1996-7 with Cascade Park, South (REALLY SOUTH.) Orchards and all lands from their old boundary before than to all the way to the City of Camas border.

Their has been threats of lawsuits and many other thing. This is one major subject that any of the new Board will facing or dealing with. If Marc loses, then who ever replaces him will face this OR candidate-elect from Betty Sue's position will have to face it.

They're are probably five or ten more subjects that are going to be facing these two positions. One of them will be the growth and potential annexation in the future of the "three creeks area," Light Rail/CRCP, the MOU/Casino, Overcrowded CC Jail, buying up parts of Downtown Vancouver for new offices or space for departments, Lewis River restoration, Salmon Creek restoration....

Guess the list could go on and on. <any one else have any issues?>