PDA

View Full Version : Light rail likely on ballot in 2009


Chief
03-11-2008, 05:53 AM
http://www.oregonlive.com/metronorth/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/metro_north_news/120520411142350.xml&coll=7

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

VANCOUVER -- Just as they did in 1995, voters in Clark County will have a say on a transit line connecting the county with Portland.

Transit supporters hope for a different result from the 2-to-1 drubbing county voters dealt to light rail more than a dozen years ago.

This time, voters likely will be asked in 2009 to approve a sales tax increase to pay for the annual expense of a transit line's operations in Vancouver. The proposed increase would be at least one-tenth of 1 percent, generating $5 million a year within C-Tran's service area. The increase would total 1 cent on a $10 purchase.

The combined state and local sales tax in Vancouver is 8.2 percent.

The voting area would include the district served by C-Tran, the agency that runs the county bus system.

That district includes Vancouver, whose west side would directly benefit from a transit line that would land in downtown and possibly run 40 blocks north.

But the district also includes farther flung, car-dependent towns such as Ridgefield, La Center, Battle Ground and Camas. The immediate benefit for voters in those areas may not be so clear.

The sales tax increase would be essential for C-Tran obtaining as much as $750 million in federal money for capital costs to build the transit line.

"If the sales tax is not approved, we will not have light rail in Vancouver," said Thayer Rorabaugh, the city's transportation director.

-- Allan Brettman

tefen
03-11-2008, 07:30 AM
Well that certainly sounds like we'll get a vote, but let's pick it apart a second.

"voters will likely be asked..."

More interesting:

"The sales tax increase would be essential for C-Tran obtaining as much as $750 million in federal money for capital costs to build the transit line."

Capital costs are Construction costs. The impression from Thayer's comments last night were that it was more likely to be for the maintenance and operations costs.

I believe he said June of 2009 is when such a vote might come. Keep your eyes peeled.

Chief
03-11-2008, 07:35 AM
I'm not sure this is accurate either. What I had heard from reliable sources, what that we needed a vote in Clark County to give C-Tran permission to expand service, and run Light Rail.

Then, the second vote was to be in the City of Vancouver only for a sales tax increase of 3 points to pay for Maintenance and Operations.

Once again we have "Moving Target Syndrome", where we have people like Thayer Rohrbaugh saying one thing to one group, and something totally different to another...

Waterbuffalo
03-11-2008, 08:48 AM
So summer 2009 is when we're going to vote on one of these? And then when is the other one going to come?

Maintenance and Operations Budget, Permission to build and Operated.. Sounds like two clear ballot titles?

Chief
03-11-2008, 02:29 PM
This is still putting the cart before the horse. The CRCP still plans to apply for Federal funding for all fo this this year, and they don't plan on coming to the voters first??

Pretty risky strategery...

Waterbuffalo
03-11-2008, 10:24 PM
OT: for a second.. I do love your new pin-ups under your commentary...

Back to commentary: Some one had to develop the stratefy, didn't they? We'll see how this whole thing works. If LRT/BRT is killed at the ballot box, how is that bridge going to be done?

Chief
03-12-2008, 05:41 AM
The transit options and the bridge itself have always been separate issues, because they have different funding sources. If light rail fails (and I believe it will) I hope that someone comes to their senses and tries to fund just the replacement bridge.

It appears that the Loot Rail special interests are going to force this to the bitter end, and drag this whole charade out for as long as possible.

Waterbuffalo
03-12-2008, 06:01 AM
"It appears that the Loot Rail special interests are going to force this to the bitter end, and drag this whole charade out for as long as possible.

Agreed..