PDA

View Full Version : Backers of third bridge to push idea again


Chief
03-05-2008, 04:53 AM
http://columbian.com/news/localNews/2008/03/03052008_Backers-of-third-bridge-to-push-idea-again.cfm

Wednesday, March 05, 2008
By JEFFREY MIZE, Columbian staff writer

Backers of building a third bridge across the Columbia River refuse to give up their multiyear struggle to get traction for their plan.

Debbie Peterson, a Republican who intends to run for the legislative seat now held by Rep. Bill Fromhold, D-Vancouver, questions the cost-effectiveness of the emerging Columbia River Crossing project.

“The third-bridge option has never been studied to the degree a replacement bridge has been studied,” she said.

Peterson has scheduled an “educational forum” for Sunday afternoon on a third bridge, which she considers an option worthy of further study before spending more than $4 billion on a replacement Interstate 5 bridge, highway improvements and light rail transit.

Sunday’s forum, in the Public Service Center, 1300 Franklin St., will begin with an informal open house at 12:30 p.m., followed by presentations at 2 p.m. and an open microphone session at 3 p.m.

Peterson said she is staging the forum with Sharon Nasset, an unsuccessful candidate for Portland City Council in 2002 who is mounting a second campaign this year.

Nasset has spent much of this decade promoting what she previously called the “Northwest Passage,” now the “BiState Industrial Corridor,” an arterial through north Portland that would cross the Columbia River at or near the existing railroad bridge.

Traffic engineers years ago rejected the idea as not a viable alternative to building a replacement or supplemental I-5 bridge because it would do little to ease mounting freeway congestion.

Even though a majority of bridge traffic enters and exits the freeway in a 5-mile stretch from Columbia Boulevard in Portland to state Highway 500 in Vancouver, engineers say there’s little reason to believe these drivers would detour a mile or more out of their way to use a third bridge.

A third bridge connected to Mill Plain Boulevard also has the potential to dump gobs of traffic onto downtown Vancouver streets.

Peterson, however, said she believes residents are only now starting to realize the implications of the Columbia River Crossing project.

“I have heard very few people in favor of the replacement bridge and light rail,” she said. “It’s sobering when I think we could spend this kind of money and have so little consensus.”

Columbia River Crossing officials are welcomed to attend Sunday’s forum and make a presentation, Peterson said.

Chief
03-05-2008, 05:15 AM
It's rant time!

For Debbie Peterson to say “The third-bridge option has never been studied to the degree a replacement bridge has been studied,” only demonstrates that she does not know what she is talking about.

It's true that there has been no engineering done on Sharon Nasset's "Alternative 14", but that's because her plan is not viable. Spending millions on engineering and design is the only way that this "plan" could be considered further, but why in hell would anyone engineer a plan that is not viable??

Anyone who says this plan has bot been considered is either lying or plain ignorant of the facts. Sharon Nassett has been presenting this plan of hers for years, and in one form or another, to every single Governmental agency in Clark County that has a Public speaking forum; including Vancouver City Council, Clark County Commissioners, the Port of Vancouver, C-TRAN, RTC, every single member of the SW Washington State Congressional delegation and anyone else who would listen. Her plan was formally submitted to the Columbia River Crossing Task Force and was rejected because it did not address any of the problems on the crossing.

It's obvious to me that Sharon Nassett has hooked herself a live one with Debbie Peterson, because Peterson has arranged for Sharon to give her rambling machine-gun delivery without a three minute time limit at the Clark Public Services Building. Sharon Nassett couldn't get that done because she is not a Washington resident.

What really got me going was the final statement:


Columbia River Crossing officials are welcomed to attend Sunday’s forum and make a presentation, Peterson said.

Why would anyone from the CRCP want to try and make a presentation at this event? Has Debbie Peterson ever attended an event by the CRCP?? I'm betting the answer to that is a resounding "NO!"...

Why on earth would they want to be there to hear Sharon Nassett's presentation yet again?? They have heard from her time and again because she has attended every single event that the Columbia Crossing project has ever had, and spammed them with her unreasonable and impractical "Alternative 14" over, and over again. She has handed out literally thousands of flyers and copies of her ideas about the Columbia Crossing and she simply refuses to take "No" for an answer.

And just so I could say "I told you so!" we have this little jewel...


Peterson said she is staging the forum with Sharon Nasset, an unsuccessful candidate for Portland City Council in 2002 who is mounting a second campaign this year.

Actually, that would be her third try, but whose counting? (She is in fact North Portland's equivalent of Charlie Stemper when it comes to failed City Council campaigns, but I digress...)

I've been predicting for a year that Sharon was planning to mount another campaign for Portland City Council, and was going to try and ride the CRCP into office. ooks like I called that one right as well...

I'll be looking into opportunities to meet up with the Debbie Peterson, and I'm seriously considering crashing her little soiree to ask a few pointed and inconvenient questions...it's just a matter of how much of my time I really want to waste on this...

Developing...

8)

karma
03-07-2008, 03:06 PM
Hey folks, Chief will buy some stock in this???

Chief
03-07-2008, 05:16 PM
Updating this nonsense...

http://www.dailyinsider.info/today.html

I-5 bridge groups meet
Sunday and Monday

The first interstate bridge connecting Vancouver and Portland was completed in 1917. Forty-one years later, 1958, that bridge was raised to allow for more barge traffic to go through without requiring use of the lift span and a twin bridge, exactly doubling capacity on the I-5 corridor was completed. Twenty-four years after that, 1982, the I-205 bridge was opened to traffic.

From time to time other transportation corridors have been considered, between Camas and Gresham, and an I-605 corridor west of I-5. Oregon transportation planners put the kibosh on the I-605 corridor in 1990.

An organization for which the Website address is www.ThirdBridgeNow.com, spearheaded by north Portland businesswoman Sharon Nasset, is holding an open house and public meeting from 12:30 to 4:30 p.m. Sunday, March 9, in the 6th floor meeting room in the Public Service Center, 1300 Franklin Street.

The focus of this “citizen transportation summit,” is a third bridge west of I-5 that would cross the Columbia River near the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad bridge in the Port of Vancouver, Hayden Island and Northwest Portland industrial areas.

The public is encouraged to attend, says Nasset. For further information, call (503) 283-9585.

A Regional Transportation Open Forum, sponsored by the Greater Vancouver Chamber of Commerce Public Affairs Committee, is from 4 to 5:30 p.m. Monday, at Washington State University Vancouver.

Presenters are the Southwest Washington Transportation Council, C-TRAN, Oregon Department of Transportation and the Columbia River Crossing Task Force.

That session is restricted to chamber of commerce members, who should call 692-2588 for further information.