PDA

View Full Version : Senate passes transportation budget after "Killer Highway" fight


Chief
02-28-2008, 05:42 PM
Proving my point there are bigger priorities in Washington State than Loot rail on the Columbia Crossing, with a wider view of the way this subject was covered earlier.


http://www.nwcn.com/statenews/washington/stories/NW_022708WAB_transportation_KC.42c3a8b.html

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

OLYMPIA, Wash. - The Washington Senate has given the green light to a slim supplemental transportation budget that would plug some big spending gaps, keeping money flowing for hundreds of roads, bridge projects and new ferries.

Wednesday's vote was a lopsided 39-10, despite fierce debate over whether lawmakers are doing enough to fix a so-called "killer highway," U.S. Highway 2 from Everett into Eastern Washington. At one point, the Republicans made it personal, saying the powerful transportation chairwoman brings home pork for her district while shortchanging the "killer highway" that has claimed 47 lives in recent years.

Sen. Val Stevens, R-Arlington, led the ill-fated, unusual fight to strip $13 million from Transportation Chairwoman Mary Margaret Haugen's district and use it to begin widening U.S. 2 to four lanes between Snohomish and Monroe. She said Haugen's project, for a railroad pullout at Stanwood, doesn't fix any big safety concerns.

Sen. Cheryl Pflug, R-Maple Valley, called Haugen's project "a convenience stop for a train," and said safety projects are far more important. She later tried without success to divert the money to bicycle-pedestrian overpasses in high traffic areas.

Haugen, who tries to write a bipartisan budget every year, seemed stunned by the unusually personal tone of the debate. She didn't personally defend the rail project, but her vice chairman, Ed Murray, D-Seattle, said the attack was snide and unfair. Haugen takes relatively few projects for her district, he said.

"We can't fix everything without new revenue," Murray said, in a jab at conservative critics who don't often support higher taxes.

Haugen said her proposed budget has $9 million for a a westbound passing lane between Sultan and Monroe, six new troopers for the highway to hold down speed and combat drunken driving, and rumble strips and re-striping to help prevent head-on collisions.

But Haugen said a comprehensive widening proposal for U.S. 2 has a billion-dollar price tag, and that no tax money is currently available. She pledged to work on the project in coming years, noting that "killer highways" have been fixed one after the other.

"Hopefully we can do more," she said. "We will get to Highway 2, but not 'til we get major new money."

The new transportation budget erases a $1.5 billion deficit projected over the next 16 years. The gap is largely due to soaring costs, lower federal matching money and slower growth in gas-tax receipts as prices climb and people drive less or buy more fuel-efficient rigs.

The budget "keeps our state moving forward and hopefully the future will be brighter," Haugen said.

The Legislature has approved two large gas tax hikes in recent years, adding 14.5 cents per gallon to the state tax. Haugen told reporters this week that additional revenue will be needed, but didn't say which taxes and tolls would be approved -- or when.

The U.S. 2 debate was the flashpoint of the House debate last week as well. House Republicans failed to force approval of a 15-mile widening of the highway, and offered it as a prime example of Democrats failing to deal with the state's most pressing transportation needs.

Some Republicans, including the ranking transportation leader, Dan Swecker of Rochester, voted for the Senate budget. Swecker said the proposal manages to keep hundreds of projects still on track despite tight finances.

"It's quite a juggling act," Swecker said.

The Senate plan trims the current $7.5 billion two-year transportation budget by $146 million.

The plan sets aside the same amount as the House and governor toward early work on a new State Route 520 floating bridge across Lake Washington and replacement of downtown Seattle's aging Alaskan Way Viaduct.

However, the Senate doesn't follow the House's presumption of early tolls for the 520 bridge replacement.

The ferry portion of the budget includes:

--$283 million for three new 144-car vessels.

--$85 million for three small boats to replace the four Steel-Electric ferries that have been removed from service because of safety concerns. One is expected to be like the 55-car Steilacoom II boat now on loan from Pierce County for the Port Townsend-Whidbey Island run, and the other two are expected to be a little larger, carrying perhaps 70 or 80 vehicles each, said Sen. Harriet Spanel, D-Bellingham.

--$15 million to refurbish the ferry Hyak.

The proposal also would provide $12 million for flood-related road repairs in southwest Washington, noted Sen. Tim Sheldon, D-Potlatch.

Senators rejected an amendment offered by Sen. Don Benton, R-Vancouver, to begin a study of a third Vancouver crossing of the Columbia River. Interstates 5 and 205 now cross the river, but Benton said the fast-growing Clark County needs a new crossing, in addition to the new bridge now planned for I-5.

House and Senate negotiators will work out differences in the two versions.

The transportation budget is House Bill 2878

Waterbuffalo
02-28-2008, 05:48 PM
From my other post in another forum, Why are we not surprised?

Why is Seattle AND Puget Sound not given the same 5 decades of "ignore ME" like they do the rest of the state?

Sounds like you and I were right. We're being ignored again.

"Show me the Money...."

Chief
02-28-2008, 07:06 PM
We are out-gunned so badly on these issues, who do you suppose they are listening to in Olympia?? Jim Moeller and Bill Fromhold?? Last I heard, they weren't being all that effective in ou-liberaling the Pugetopolis Liberals either.

The only local delegate who has any traction is The Boy Wonder, Craig Pridemore, but his nose is buried so far up the Governor's arse, I hear Chrissy had stoplights installed so that Craig wouldn't break his nose. He could care less about Clark County, unless it comes to finding another way to separate us from our money...

8)

Waterbuffalo
03-01-2008, 12:23 AM
Well where is the bread guys? (to all of our state legislators..)

Chief, I'm not going to go that far. We have issues simply put. And if every generation of state legislators doesn't understand that they're basically fighting Seattle and other puget sound communities for funding for Pork Barrel projects that never seem to end.

There are Honestly several places I think in Seattle and in that area that do need to be fixed.

One would be some how phase in over 15 years or so a budget to replace "Every" state ferry that services Elliot Bay and port of Call from the San Juan Islands south.

Two look into options that will make our ability to stop driving around for every little situation. I'd say there is probably a HUGE business opp. here for creating a grocery buying service, offering extended hours of shopping for furniture or other things for the working public outside of the normal 9 to 5 time frame that most of rural America is used to.

May be have appointment based hours for businesses that have expensive items like cars, boats, furniture or many other things that honestly why would we want people driving around mid-day for in the Portland metro area when the congestion is the most unbearable? May be offer a an online catalogue of stuff? :-) Honestly there is a MILLION opportunities for this thing.. And you know what, A Washington state company COULD lead the way in it.

To get people out of their cars and show them other ways of getting things done. All of the car driving outside of going to work is basically a mindset. Now how does one change that mindset? I'd love to see a lot of other ideas than building a toll bridge for I-5 with Light Rail.

But I do know that we need to replace those bridges. So how are we going to make our local community better and find ways to make Puget Sound Townships more efficient?

Why should people having to go into government offices spending hours to get this or that document? Online sourcing sure would be a wonderful idea?

I don't know about any one else but I'd RATHER not have to ride Mill Plain buses, drive or ride to various functions that could be shifted to other times or did different ways.. hmm

Guess I better get out my pencil, ruler and business acumen.. Sounds like a wonderful opportunity to exploit!